Thread:TheSitcomLover/@comment-2236231-20140907170720/@comment-3399576-20140908021450

Baron Joshua wrote: TheSitcomLover wrote: I think it should be just "Actors." ... Can't say I support that (starts to consider). Actress is a recent term, considering that for a long time woman where forbidden from acting in western society; thus why Actor is a more promenenent term. Looking a little deeper, Actor is genderless, with the term Acress having been created to signify a female actor. So, having woman in the actors category isn't incorrect. In fact, it'd be spot on. Still, some people would like to only view individuals who are female actors, whom are known as Actresses in order to attract attention to the fact that woman are allowed to take on acting roles.

I think having Actresses as a subcategory of Actors might solve the issue; though as I see no harm in leaving out the actresses category- I'm not the executive of the site, so I can't make a management decision on the matter, only Seacactus can do so.

You have some gumption I suppose, undoing his undo of your revision to the Joan Rivers article. I do think you two should discuss differences, as he has been reacting somewhat negatively to your actions here on the site. So he don't like me?