Thread:TheSitcomLover/@comment-2236231-20140825122405/@comment-3399576-20140825155720

Baron Joshua wrote: TheSitcomLover wrote: Well, I just want the Michael Jackson article to stay the way I left it. And what are you talking about Seacactus? You've never noticed the comments he makes in the summery sections... alright, I'm sorry, I shouldn'th have assumed you where being bothered.

I don't want to cause any trouble between the two of you, though he is frustrated at you.

As stated I did not edit the actual content, the bulk of the article, which I assume to be the most important aspect to you. For example; if some one where to remove all the categories it wouldn't upset you as much as someone coming in, editing, and condensing everything down to a single sentence "Micheal Jackson was an American pop music singer whose proformances have him aclaimed the king of pop." is someone did that, i assume you'd be furious. Not that anyone would do that, I'm just saying that perhaps the categories aren't that improtant, and you could afford to have him recognized among the other American actors, poets, and songwriters here on the Amazing Everything. Okay, but just a question: If you edit the MJ article again, is it okay if I change it back?